We WON a reversal of a jury verdict and new trial on appeal!
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:43 am
Here is a copy of the Appellate Court's decision, Amodeo v Cumella, http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseri ... _04762.htm
In a nutshell, we went to trial and lost. As is the case in probably everyone's delivery - everyone in the room considered the shoulder dystocia an "obstetrical emergency". At trial the doctor never testified that he had no other choices because of the emergency, he claimed he did nothing wrong. When it came time to give the jury instructions the doctor's lawyer asked for the emergency doctrine charge and the judge gave it to him. In basic terms, the emergency doctrine says that if you are confronted with a sudden and unforeseen emergency (not of your own making) and your reaction to the emergency causes harm, you could be found not negligent. This is a doctrine that is used most often in motor vehicle accident cases, not a medical malpractice case. By giving the doctor the emergency doctrine charge, the judge effectively lowered the standard of care that the doctor was held against.
If anyone here has a trial coming up (in any state) let your attorney know about this decision...it might help your case. I have found out that this tactic has been used by defendants lawyers before...maybe now that door has been closed.
In a nutshell, we went to trial and lost. As is the case in probably everyone's delivery - everyone in the room considered the shoulder dystocia an "obstetrical emergency". At trial the doctor never testified that he had no other choices because of the emergency, he claimed he did nothing wrong. When it came time to give the jury instructions the doctor's lawyer asked for the emergency doctrine charge and the judge gave it to him. In basic terms, the emergency doctrine says that if you are confronted with a sudden and unforeseen emergency (not of your own making) and your reaction to the emergency causes harm, you could be found not negligent. This is a doctrine that is used most often in motor vehicle accident cases, not a medical malpractice case. By giving the doctor the emergency doctrine charge, the judge effectively lowered the standard of care that the doctor was held against.
If anyone here has a trial coming up (in any state) let your attorney know about this decision...it might help your case. I have found out that this tactic has been used by defendants lawyers before...maybe now that door has been closed.